A disastrous performance from the Wallabies in the second Test against South Africa has seen them lose 8-24 – and we suspect a few of you are itching to get into the ratings to really vent your frustrations.
That’s where we come in. You don’t have to rate all 23 – if you didn’t catch enough of someone’s performance or don’t think they were on the field long enough for you to make a judgment, just leave them blank and it won’t affect their score.
If you need a rough guide as to what each score means, here’s what we go off.
1. Had he not played, the team would have been better off. Negatively affected the performance of the side. May God John Eales have mercy on his soul.
2. Anonymous. Was he even there?
3. Did some things that you expect a player to be able to do, but did a whole bunch of other things that sucked.
4. Was passable in patches, but not up to standard in a match of such importance.
5. Performed his role without anything really noticeable happening.
6. Good.
7. Pretty good, actually.
8. Very good.
9. Excellent.
10. Extraordinary. Calling them man of the match would be an insult.
We suspect Marika Koroibete won’t be getting as many perfect 10s this week…
If you’re ready to get ranking, just head to the form below and make your choices!
Leave a Reply